Key Points
- A WSJ review of 1,105 videos found Polymarket paid creators to film fake bets and wins.
- The staged wagers totaled roughly $1.9 million; none were real.
- Creators got $2,000–$3,000 a month and were told not to disclose the deals.
- The clips, pushed by a paid reposting network, drew more than 140 million views.
The viral clips of regular people turning small Polymarket bets into windfalls were a marketing operation, not a phenomenon. A Wall Street Journal investigation reviewed 1,105 videos and found the prediction market paid social-media creators to film bets — and sometimes wins — on sites built to mimic the real Polymarket. The wagers shown added up to about $1.9 million. Not one was real.
How the machine worked
Creators were paid $2,000 to $3,000 a month and asked not to disclose the partnership, according to the Journal. Across 118 clips, they celebrated nearly $900,000 in fake winnings; in reality those same wagers would have lost more than $166,000, and more than half of every clip showing a win would actually have ended in a loss. A marketing contractor then ran what the paper called a "social-media army" to repost the footage, racking up more than 140 million views — manufactured FOMO at industrial scale.
The US wrinkle
The most awkward detail is who the campaign targeted. Polymarket's main exchange has been closed to US users since a 2022 settlement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and many of the Americans watching the clips could only reach the platform through a VPN. A growth tactic aimed at users a company is not supposed to serve sits uneasily next to the legal grey zone the platform already occupies — the same zone that has drawn federal legislation aimed at prediction markets. Polymarket said it would audit its promotional content and remains "committed to maintaining accurate, fair, and transparent markets."
Source: TechCrunch, Decrypt
Comments